<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Does God So Love the Multiverse?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://terahertzatheist.ca/2008/04/25/does-god-so-love-the-multiverse/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://terahertzatheist.ca/2008/04/25/does-god-so-love-the-multiverse/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 18:54:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://terahertzatheist.ca/2008/04/25/does-god-so-love-the-multiverse/comment-page-1/#comment-39228</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Jan 2011 21:34:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://terahertz.wordpress.com/?p=159#comment-39228</guid>
		<description>Well the problem with your second to  last  sentence is that this &quot;modern science&quot; as you admit is not  testable and therefore does not require reconciliation.  You are attempting and failing at having it both ways. If its not yet  testable then its not science.

Worse we are not even near conceptually to determining what would create a  multiverse even if we could yet verify  its existence.  Finally as most I don&#039;t think you  grasp the concept of infinity.  Even if you had 10 to  the 500th universe it would still be highly selective in regard to the infinite universes that could have been created and the  fine tuning argument could and eventually still would be made.   Essentially why is the multiverse  tuned to the 10 the 500th  universes   that allowed life when it could have been fine tuned to the 10 5,000,000 which wouldn&#039;t allow life 

and if  there are infinite amount of universes then by the definition of  infinity they would be unlimited by nothing and thence essentially supernatural.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well the problem with your second to  last  sentence is that this &#8220;modern science&#8221; as you admit is not  testable and therefore does not require reconciliation.  You are attempting and failing at having it both ways. If its not yet  testable then its not science.</p>
<p>Worse we are not even near conceptually to determining what would create a  multiverse even if we could yet verify  its existence.  Finally as most I don&#8217;t think you  grasp the concept of infinity.  Even if you had 10 to  the 500th universe it would still be highly selective in regard to the infinite universes that could have been created and the  fine tuning argument could and eventually still would be made.   Essentially why is the multiverse  tuned to the 10 the 500th  universes   that allowed life when it could have been fine tuned to the 10 5,000,000 which wouldn&#8217;t allow life </p>
<p>and if  there are infinite amount of universes then by the definition of  infinity they would be unlimited by nothing and thence essentially supernatural.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: baby raptor jesus</title>
		<link>http://terahertzatheist.ca/2008/04/25/does-god-so-love-the-multiverse/comment-page-1/#comment-39185</link>
		<dc:creator>baby raptor jesus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Dec 2010 01:12:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://terahertz.wordpress.com/?p=159#comment-39185</guid>
		<description>&quot;your lack of faith is based on &quot;faith&quot; just as much as any theistic belief&quot;

@ EZRA....  thats just like saying i lack belief because i believe in a NON god. which is almost as retarded as yahweh &quot;himself&quot; .what part of LACK of belief in a god don&#039;t you get?Anyway you dont need to believe in Evidence.And if there is no evidence for something, i dont need evidence to REJECT ur O.G fa****.and &quot;faith&quot; is just 100% gullibility for an imaginary friend to be your personal slave master. 

 p.s, ur magic book is not evidence. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;your lack of faith is based on &#8220;faith&#8221; just as much as any theistic belief&#8221;</p>
<p>@ EZRA&#8230;.  thats just like saying i lack belief because i believe in a NON god. which is almost as retarded as yahweh &#8220;himself&#8221; .what part of LACK of belief in a god don&#8217;t you get?Anyway you dont need to believe in Evidence.And if there is no evidence for something, i dont need evidence to REJECT ur O.G fa****.and &#8220;faith&#8221; is just 100% gullibility for an imaginary friend to be your personal slave master. </p>
<p> p.s, ur magic book is not evidence. <img src='http://terahertzatheist.ca/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ezra</title>
		<link>http://terahertzatheist.ca/2008/04/25/does-god-so-love-the-multiverse/comment-page-1/#comment-3868</link>
		<dc:creator>Ezra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 20:33:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://terahertz.wordpress.com/?p=159#comment-3868</guid>
		<description>Your &quot;rationality&quot; is irrational. Realize your &quot;lack of faith&quot; is based on faith just as much as any theistic belief.

Hypocrite.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your &#8220;rationality&#8221; is irrational. Realize your &#8220;lack of faith&#8221; is based on faith just as much as any theistic belief.</p>
<p>Hypocrite.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wanted: one irrational physicist &#171; Terahertz - From Physics to Life</title>
		<link>http://terahertzatheist.ca/2008/04/25/does-god-so-love-the-multiverse/comment-page-1/#comment-155</link>
		<dc:creator>Wanted: one irrational physicist &#171; Terahertz - From Physics to Life</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 03:50:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://terahertz.wordpress.com/?p=159#comment-155</guid>
		<description>[...] here at the University of Alberta, we have a physicist who talks about (an evangelical Christian) God and the multiverse (Don Page), except, unfortunately for Denyse, he realizes the two are potentially compatible (like [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] here at the University of Alberta, we have a physicist who talks about (an evangelical Christian) God and the multiverse (Don Page), except, unfortunately for Denyse, he realizes the two are potentially compatible (like [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don Page, Physics, and Theology &#171; Terahertz - From Physics to Life</title>
		<link>http://terahertzatheist.ca/2008/04/25/does-god-so-love-the-multiverse/comment-page-1/#comment-154</link>
		<dc:creator>Don Page, Physics, and Theology &#171; Terahertz - From Physics to Life</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 05:26:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://terahertz.wordpress.com/?p=159#comment-154</guid>
		<description>[...] - From Physics to Life Rantings and ravings from physics and life in general.    &#171; Does God So Love the&#160;Multiverse?    Don Page, Physics, and&#160;Theology 1 May 2008   My last post was on Don Page&#8217;s [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &#8211; From Physics to Life Rantings and ravings from physics and life in general.    &laquo; Does God So Love the&nbsp;Multiverse?    Don Page, Physics, and&nbsp;Theology 1 May 2008   My last post was on Don Page&#8217;s [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

