Comments on: Getting something from nothing

By: Ian

Thu, 04 Sep 2008 02:25:02 +0000

I’m sorry, your response was convoluted. If you want to throw accusations around you actually have to point to something substantial. We have evidence that the micro-world really is different than the macro-world and the laws you are used to with books just don’t apply at atomic scales.

If you have evidence that contradicts the last 100 years of modern physics, please present it now.

]]>

By: stephen newport

Wed, 03 Sep 2008 23:30:15 +0000

This post seems slightly convoluted. While I would not debate the potential for everything we know about physics and thermodynamics to be turned on its head by new information, the statement that something happens without a cause seems a bit presumptous. If a book randomly fell off of a shelf, and we observed other books falling off shelves, and even if we saw it again and again I don’t think we’d so easily jump to the conclusion that it was somehow, ‘uncaused!’ But it seems like people are more forgiving (and even extatic) when assumptions are made about the micro-word (invisible to our naked eyes) without sufficient understanding.

]]>

By: Carnivals abound! | Terahertz

Sun, 31 Aug 2008 01:23:59 +0000

[…] the 99th Carnival of the Godless my post Getting Something From Nothing was featured. Check out the Carnival for more godless […]

]]>

By: Carnival of the Godless # 99 « Oz Atheist’s Weblog

Sat, 30 Aug 2008 22:15:56 +0000

[…] presents Getting something from nothing posted at Terahertz. If the above link doesn’t work, please try this alternate link: Getting […]

]]>

By: Getting something from nothing - Edger

Fri, 08 Aug 2008 16:14:59 +0000

[…] (Original Post) […]

]]>