<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: On light and morality</title>
	<atom:link href="http://terahertzatheist.ca/2008/08/17/on-light-and-morality/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://terahertzatheist.ca/2008/08/17/on-light-and-morality/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 03:28:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: anton kozlik</title>
		<link>http://terahertzatheist.ca/2008/08/17/on-light-and-morality/comment-page-1/#comment-373</link>
		<dc:creator>anton kozlik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 04:10:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://terahertzatheist.ca/?p=467#comment-373</guid>
		<description>Hi,
   Is it possible that our philosophical views could get in the way of definitions of morality that are more applicable to the human condition? Why not try my attempt to bring the question of morality into a usuable perspective. Visit my site to see if you agree.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,<br />
   Is it possible that our philosophical views could get in the way of definitions of morality that are more applicable to the human condition? Why not try my attempt to bring the question of morality into a usuable perspective. Visit my site to see if you agree.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

