Comments on: A sceptical White House? http://terahertzatheist.ca/2008/11/10/a-sceptical-white-house/ Sun, 03 Mar 2013 08:21:08 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1 By: Brian D http://terahertzatheist.ca/2008/11/10/a-sceptical-white-house/comment-page-1/#comment-2361 Brian D Wed, 26 Nov 2008 07:31:40 +0000 http://terahertzatheist.ca/?p=1169#comment-2361 Late adendum: Obama skips church, heads to gym. Consider the source, which may explain the wording chosen (“Both [previous president-elects] managed to attend church in the weeks after they were elected.”) and the Wright namedrop.

Also, compare Obama’s response to election to Dubya’s (which is painstakingly recounted in the article), or if you prefer, the Call to Renewal speech (the pertinent clips, accompanied by a summary from Wingnuttia, can be seen here) as opposed to pretty much any of this.

This reminds me vaguely of how my family tried to raise me (also in the United tradition) — religion being defining but not enslaving, belonging to faith but not bound by it, where church is as much (or more so!) social as it is spiritual for its congregation.

I wouldn’t say it’s a freethinker in the White House (we can all agree that this would cost a candidate the substantial Jesus vote), but I would say it’s a good jump closer to secular humanism.

]]>
By: Jack http://terahertzatheist.ca/2008/11/10/a-sceptical-white-house/comment-page-1/#comment-2206 Jack Sat, 22 Nov 2008 14:16:06 +0000 http://terahertzatheist.ca/?p=1169#comment-2206 barack obama march 2008 interview…

I found your post interesting and share most of your views, but just dont get your second point….

]]>
By: A skeptical White House? | All Reason http://terahertzatheist.ca/2008/11/10/a-sceptical-white-house/comment-page-1/#comment-2007 A skeptical White House? | All Reason Wed, 19 Nov 2008 00:07:06 +0000 http://terahertzatheist.ca/?p=1169#comment-2007 [...] (Cross posted) [...]

]]>
By: James Bell http://terahertzatheist.ca/2008/11/10/a-sceptical-white-house/comment-page-1/#comment-1690 James Bell Mon, 10 Nov 2008 20:33:40 +0000 http://terahertzatheist.ca/?p=1169#comment-1690 I’m not so sure I follow the logic. Sure, he /could/ be a skeptic. But I’m one of those who use “good ol’ fashioned prayers” and I’d be quite likely to say the same thing as he did about seances.
That’s like saying you heard someone say that pork is disgusting therefore you draw the conclusion that he’s a vegetarian.

]]>