Comments on: The UAAA gets email http://terahertzatheist.ca/2009/01/29/the-uaaa-gets-email/ Sun, 03 Mar 2013 08:21:08 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1 By: Thomas http://terahertzatheist.ca/2009/01/29/the-uaaa-gets-email/comment-page-1/#comment-4296 Thomas Fri, 30 Jan 2009 03:48:27 +0000 http://terahertzatheist.ca/?p=1407#comment-4296 Ian, we really need to make a book out of all the emails and messages that you’ve received. I could use a good laugh during midterm week.

]]>
By: Chris http://terahertzatheist.ca/2009/01/29/the-uaaa-gets-email/comment-page-1/#comment-4295 Chris Fri, 30 Jan 2009 02:58:19 +0000 http://terahertzatheist.ca/?p=1407#comment-4295 I wonder if Mr. Kotyk sees the irony in his statements. Why not let everyone else believe what they want? That was the entire point of changing the convocation address. We weren’t stopping people from believing in what they want; we were doing quite the contrary.

Calling us “behaviourly challenged juveniles” while at the same time, sending an angry email to someone you disagree with and calling their lives “petty” also oozes with irony…

]]>
By: Bob http://terahertzatheist.ca/2009/01/29/the-uaaa-gets-email/comment-page-1/#comment-4292 Bob Fri, 30 Jan 2009 00:55:59 +0000 http://terahertzatheist.ca/?p=1407#comment-4292 The whole point of changing the charge was so that it was more inclusive towards those who do not believe. How can the phrase “use your degree for the glory of God” possibly be inclusive towards those who choose not to have a religion?

]]>
By: Dave http://terahertzatheist.ca/2009/01/29/the-uaaa-gets-email/comment-page-1/#comment-4286 Dave Thu, 29 Jan 2009 22:27:55 +0000 http://terahertzatheist.ca/?p=1407#comment-4286 Uh oh….I think someone needs to give their WWJD bracelet a good hard snap.

]]>
By: Ryan http://terahertzatheist.ca/2009/01/29/the-uaaa-gets-email/comment-page-1/#comment-4285 Ryan Thu, 29 Jan 2009 22:23:32 +0000 http://terahertzatheist.ca/?p=1407#comment-4285 “why not let everyone else believe what they chose”

I think (albeit with better grammar), that was the point of our complaint in the first place.

]]>