<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Secular hypocrisy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://terahertzatheist.ca/2009/05/10/secular-hypocrisy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://terahertzatheist.ca/2009/05/10/secular-hypocrisy/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 19:56:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: james</title>
		<link>http://terahertzatheist.ca/2009/05/10/secular-hypocrisy/comment-page-1/#comment-12404</link>
		<dc:creator>james</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 13:36:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://terahertzatheist.ca/?p=1745#comment-12404</guid>
		<description>Why is it hypocritical?  If you believe in extending reason&#039;s sway over human affairs, stand up and say it, support a reason day and oppose days that promote or recognize non-reason.  It&#039;s not hypocritical - it&#039;s your position.  Presumably, you support reason...for a reason...one of which is that non-reason&#039;s influence is negative and that reason has some sort of universal, foundational status. Reason and non-reason/religion are not epistemic equivalents, so there&#039;s no hypocrisy in supporting a reason day and opposing officially sanctioned or supported religious days.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why is it hypocritical?  If you believe in extending reason&#8217;s sway over human affairs, stand up and say it, support a reason day and oppose days that promote or recognize non-reason.  It&#8217;s not hypocritical &#8211; it&#8217;s your position.  Presumably, you support reason&#8230;for a reason&#8230;one of which is that non-reason&#8217;s influence is negative and that reason has some sort of universal, foundational status. Reason and non-reason/religion are not epistemic equivalents, so there&#8217;s no hypocrisy in supporting a reason day and opposing officially sanctioned or supported religious days.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruce</title>
		<link>http://terahertzatheist.ca/2009/05/10/secular-hypocrisy/comment-page-1/#comment-12389</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 08:15:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://terahertzatheist.ca/?p=1745#comment-12389</guid>
		<description>I have to agree with you. I was very happy to enjoy my little life of Atheist freedom and not really get too vocal about it. I&#039;m gay, so feeling that way comes naturally to me. 

I spend enough time fighting the big religion machine as a gay man without bringing up the question of god, or intelligent design (still the biggest oxymoron I&#039;ve heard to date), and it all comes down to faith, for them.  

I can relate all the empirical experience and knowledge I want and no matter what I say, someone who has never really read the bible will quote it and say I am wrong and that&#039;s all they need to know. Because what I do looks like faith to them. 

As long as we stick to our guns and not bother celebrating our lack of faith, we don&#039;t fall into the cult trap. We don&#039;t really to celebrate our lack of faith, knowledge needs no celebration.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to agree with you. I was very happy to enjoy my little life of Atheist freedom and not really get too vocal about it. I&#8217;m gay, so feeling that way comes naturally to me. </p>
<p>I spend enough time fighting the big religion machine as a gay man without bringing up the question of god, or intelligent design (still the biggest oxymoron I&#8217;ve heard to date), and it all comes down to faith, for them.  </p>
<p>I can relate all the empirical experience and knowledge I want and no matter what I say, someone who has never really read the bible will quote it and say I am wrong and that&#8217;s all they need to know. Because what I do looks like faith to them. </p>
<p>As long as we stick to our guns and not bother celebrating our lack of faith, we don&#8217;t fall into the cult trap. We don&#8217;t really to celebrate our lack of faith, knowledge needs no celebration.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Devin</title>
		<link>http://terahertzatheist.ca/2009/05/10/secular-hypocrisy/comment-page-1/#comment-12378</link>
		<dc:creator>Devin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 04:53:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://terahertzatheist.ca/?p=1745#comment-12378</guid>
		<description>I would agree with you had they tried to make it an &quot;Atheism Day&quot; or (to a lesser extent) &quot;Secularism Day&quot;.  This doesn&#039;t seem to be forcing values on anyone.

Just because an secular humanist organization promoted it, and is encouraging other atheist/secular humanist organizations to do the same, does not make it an atheist day.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would agree with you had they tried to make it an &#8220;Atheism Day&#8221; or (to a lesser extent) &#8220;Secularism Day&#8221;.  This doesn&#8217;t seem to be forcing values on anyone.</p>
<p>Just because an secular humanist organization promoted it, and is encouraging other atheist/secular humanist organizations to do the same, does not make it an atheist day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Majik Sznak</title>
		<link>http://terahertzatheist.ca/2009/05/10/secular-hypocrisy/comment-page-1/#comment-12372</link>
		<dc:creator>Majik Sznak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 03:32:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://terahertzatheist.ca/?p=1745#comment-12372</guid>
		<description>But is it really an imposition or is it just recognition?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But is it really an imposition or is it just recognition?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chrystal Ocean</title>
		<link>http://terahertzatheist.ca/2009/05/10/secular-hypocrisy/comment-page-1/#comment-12348</link>
		<dc:creator>Chrystal Ocean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 May 2009 23:32:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://terahertzatheist.ca/?p=1745#comment-12348</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t think it&#039;s so much hypocritical as silly. Although I do see your point in another sense. I don&#039;t appreciate anyone imposing their day on me, secularists or not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s so much hypocritical as silly. Although I do see your point in another sense. I don&#8217;t appreciate anyone imposing their day on me, secularists or not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
