<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pentecostal Chaplain supports secularism</title>
	<atom:link href="http://terahertzatheist.ca/2009/05/16/pentecostal-chaplain-supports-secularism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://terahertzatheist.ca/2009/05/16/pentecostal-chaplain-supports-secularism/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 00:31:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Glombick</title>
		<link>http://terahertzatheist.ca/2009/05/16/pentecostal-chaplain-supports-secularism/comment-page-1/#comment-14524</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Glombick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 17:26:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://terahertzatheist.ca/?p=1754#comment-14524</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m glad you appreciated my comments Ian.  However, it&#039;s a bit of a stretch to say that I &quot;support secularism.&quot;

I will say that I recognize the significantly secular nature of current Canadian culture, and since this is a democratic nation, I think that secularism needs to be respected in political matters like &#039;official charges&#039;.

I definitely still personally &quot;support&quot; a theistic, faith-based approach to life (including politics) more than anything, but I recognize that my own perspective cannot be respected if I do not respect that of secularists who disagree with me.

At the same time, I hope that gaps can be bridged and that Canadians can increasingly see the interrelation of what is &quot;sacred&quot; (from a faith-perspective) and what is &quot;secular&quot; (at least in terms of everyday material realities that are not ordinarily considered from a spiritual standpoint).

For that reason, I was happy that the convocation charge still retained the word &quot;God,&quot; but made it more open to reflect the diverse nature of Canadian perspectives on faith and spirituality.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m glad you appreciated my comments Ian.  However, it&#8217;s a bit of a stretch to say that I &#8220;support secularism.&#8221;</p>
<p>I will say that I recognize the significantly secular nature of current Canadian culture, and since this is a democratic nation, I think that secularism needs to be respected in political matters like &#8216;official charges&#8217;.</p>
<p>I definitely still personally &#8220;support&#8221; a theistic, faith-based approach to life (including politics) more than anything, but I recognize that my own perspective cannot be respected if I do not respect that of secularists who disagree with me.</p>
<p>At the same time, I hope that gaps can be bridged and that Canadians can increasingly see the interrelation of what is &#8220;sacred&#8221; (from a faith-perspective) and what is &#8220;secular&#8221; (at least in terms of everyday material realities that are not ordinarily considered from a spiritual standpoint).</p>
<p>For that reason, I was happy that the convocation charge still retained the word &#8220;God,&#8221; but made it more open to reflect the diverse nature of Canadian perspectives on faith and spirituality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

