Comments on: BCNDP Leadership Debate
http://terahertzatheist.ca/2011/03/06/bcndp-leadership-debate/
Fri, 11 Mar 2011 04:36:04 +0000hourly1http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4By: Ian
http://terahertzatheist.ca/2011/03/06/bcndp-leadership-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-39282
IanMon, 07 Mar 2011 18:49:55 +0000http://terahertzatheist.ca/2011/03/06/bcndp-leadership-debate/#comment-39282It was mentioned, but given the short time span and broad range of topics (especially ones the BC Liberals have failed at), it wasn't specifically asked. They all seemed to support an inquiry and many pointed out Christy Clark's personal involvements and her potential unease and weakness on the issue. It will definitely be a campaign issue for whoever wins the leadership.It was mentioned, but given the short time span and broad range of topics (especially ones the BC Liberals have failed at), it wasn’t specifically asked. They all seemed to support an inquiry and many pointed out Christy Clark’s personal involvements and her potential unease and weakness on the issue. It will definitely be a campaign issue for whoever wins the leadership.
]]>By: BC Mary
http://terahertzatheist.ca/2011/03/06/bcndp-leadership-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-39281
BC MaryMon, 07 Mar 2011 18:47:14 +0000http://terahertzatheist.ca/2011/03/06/bcndp-leadership-debate/#comment-39281Whoa Nelly ... wasn't there any mention of a Public Inquiry into the corrupt sale of BC Rail?
In my opinion, if the BC NDP guarantees the necessary Public Inquiry -- to fulfill the public duty which BC Supreme Court failed -- they'd easily capture the votes needed to form the next government.Whoa Nelly … wasn’t there any mention of a Public Inquiry into the corrupt sale of BC Rail?
In my opinion, if the BC NDP guarantees the necessary Public Inquiry — to fulfill the public duty which BC Supreme Court failed — they’d easily capture the votes needed to form the next government.