Comments on: Why I oppose strategic voting

By: Vibration Machine

Tue, 07 Jun 2011 21:51:20 +0000

Some how strategic voting was always done one riding at a time, which usually means one party loses votes. What I’m suggesting here is a way that would allow each party to receive its fair share of seats and it fair share of votes.

]]>

By: Vibration Machine

Tue, 07 Jun 2011 21:50:32 +0000

I truly agree with you. I am never a fan of strategic voting. Its just dumb.

]]>

By: Massimo

Sun, 01 May 2011 03:17:04 +0000

Completely agree, and in fact there is one more reason: knowing that eventually many leftwing voters will have to vote for them anyway, because they have nowhere else to go if they want to defeat the conservatives, the liberals can feel free to move to the right, trying to attract conservative votes. Progressive causes are left behind, as the Liberals try to convince conservative voters that they can be just as conservatives as the conservatives.

]]>

By: Devin Johnston

Sat, 30 Apr 2011 19:40:31 +0000

I agree entirely with you arguments against strategic voting. I’ve been saying much the same thing for years – strategic voting is corrosive to political choice and plurality. In a democracy, you ought to be able for the candidate you think is best.

]]>