Jonathan Abrams and the Ottawa Skeptics do good work. They are on the front lines of the battle over Bill C-51 which hopes to better regulate “natural health products” (aka wacky untested vitamins) and provide a lot of rationality in our nations capital. They don’t touch religion (as many skeptics groups won’t), and that’s there perogative.
Their website posts a lot of good articles on skepticism, including full references, however I have to rebut a bit of the latest one on Quantum Mechanics. Overall the article gets the right idea and right point but I think one paragraph is mistaken:
Quantum mechanics is weird. Countless precise experiments have shown results that defy our everyday experience. Applying QM to the real world essentially says if I were to throw a rock at you, there is a chance it will hit you. There is also a chance it will pass right through you unaltered, and there is a chance it will land on the moon. It also suggests that another rock somewhere could be “entangled” with the one I have and will do the same thing instantaneously. These oddball phenomena lend themselves very well to the suggestion that, since everything is made of atomic material, instantaneous action at a distance works. How does it work? Via an invisible life force that flows through us and connects us all. QM itself does not draw any boundary line between the level of scale where it’s strangeness is revealed, and the level of scale of the world we live in. [Emphasis added]
Perhaps it’s my personal bias, but the phrase “invisible life force” just credits woo authors too much. QM is a mathematical approximation (which works amazingly well) that describes wavefunctions (which are related to the probability of particles being in certain locations or having certain velocities) of particles. Two particles can be “entangled” meaning part of their wavefunction is dependant on another particle.
However, none of this is alive, none of this involves a force, and nothing is flowing. Not in the traditional (Newtonian) sense of the words, not in the woo sense of the words and not in any other modern sense of the words.
Finally, in general there is a scale difference between the “quantum world” and the “macro world.” Every particle has a de Broglie wavelength. This number relates its momentum (or mass times velocity) to an energy and then to a length that it will interact quantum mechanically. If a particle is trapped in a box of the size of its deBroglie wavelength, it tends to exhibit “weird” quantum effects (like the ability to only exist in discrete energy states, or tunnelling energy barriers). The boundary is not firm, but neither is the boundary for baldness.
So kudos to the Ottawa Skeptics for their (generally) good work.